La ley o la barbarie – Meczyki

MIAMI, FL.- The reappearance of Donald Trump in Washington to present a government plan without announcing his candidacy is the astute movement of a fat fish that sees the networks of its possible capture.

Trump, since the Presidency of the Republic, wanted to violate the democracy of the United States and in this case committed crimes.

Let’s see if the leaders of the institutions of this country have the courage to defend the democratic system or they fold before a bellicose populist who has support among the population.

The United States faces an existential dilemma as a democracy.

No es una battle Biden-Trump, sino la permanencia de la norm que por más de dos siglos ha hecho fuertes y estables: nadie por encina de la ley.

Las audiencias sobre el asalto al Capitolio el 6 de enero de 2021 exponen claramente la responsabilidad del expresidente Trump en el intento de golpe.

Trump violated his constitutional duty to protect democratic institutions by standing cross-legged for 187 minutes while his sympathizers shot and hit the heart of the popular sovereignty of the United States.

Trump, despite a specific request from the Republican leader in the House of Representatives, avoided calling the police and the armed forces to stop the invasion.

Trump gave instructions to withdraw from the Secret Service of the meeting of the 6th of January, despite having been informed officially that his sympathizers were armed.

Trump illegally asked the Secretary of State of Georgia to find more than 11 thousand votes to reverse Joe Biden’s legitimate election victory.

Trump’s Vice President Mike Pence Para Wailer La Li y Declare Nola La Joranda Electoral de November Del 2020.

Trump instructed his electoral lawyer, Rudolf Giuliani, to call legislators to withdraw the qualification of Joe Biden’s electoral triumph.

Trump instructed Giuliani to operate the implantation of false electors during the state meetings of the Electoral College.

Trump’s chance to be freed from a judicial process has a name: Merrick Garland, Procurador General de Justicia de este país.

Garland es un abogado afable que bien pudo ser magistrado de la Suprema Corte, pero lacke de arrojo politico para perseguir judicialmente a Trump.

Al frente del Departamento de Justicia habría funcionado de manera brillante Kamala Harris, desperdiciada en una vicepresidencia sin brillo whose most recent press release was a telephone conversation with the President of Guyana.

El procurador Garland signed, en días recientes, the United Nations memorandum en el que instructye a los fiscales del Departamento de Justicia a actuare cautelosamente en las averiguaciones del 6 de enero y requirar autorización oficial antes de a persecialíostores de alegalíosamente.

Por eso el mitin de Trump en Washington esta semana, donde dejó ver –sino comprometerse– sus aspiraciones presidenciales.

Garland’s concern is to avoid any perception of interference in the electoral political process, and to comply with the unwritten rule of not judicially encausaring a potential aspirant.

The prohibition of sin, the pressure exerted by the public opinion and by the members of the committee of the 6th of January seem to have the effect of preventing Trump from converting the United Nations into an outsider of the law.

There are signs that Trump’s days in politics could be counted.

Ahí están, la decision de perseguir por desacato a quien fuera su principal estratega politico, Steve Bannon.

El cateo de la residence de Geoffrey Clark, uno de los procuradores de Justicia de Trump que estaba a favor de invalidar la elección a pesar de que no existía un soporte legal

The confiscation of the cell phone of John Eastman, the lawyer of Trump who invented the false legal theory about the attributions of the vice president to invalidate the election.

El citatorio judicial a Mark Short, exjefe del cabinet del vicepresidente Mike Pence ante un gran jurado, que es el mecanismo formal para definir un encausamiento judicial.

La filtración en The Washington Post es lo más fuerte: Trump and his actions form part of the criminal investigation of the Department of Justice about the presidential elections of 2020.

If the Departamento de Justicia decides the United Nations encausamiento criminal against Trump, habrá gave a significant step to demonstrate that, effectively, in the United States no one is above the law.

But if prosecutor Garland, despite the overwhelming evidence against Trump, does nothing, he will inflict irreparable damage to the democratic institutions and the justice system of this country.

Está en juego el Estado de derecho, the application of the law above political considerations and the confirmation that no one is above them. Ni Trump.

Se trata, pues, de un dilema entre la ley o la barbarie.

Doscientos años de historia los contemplan.